Skip to main content
← Methodologies
Family F01 · Blue CarbonMCC-CCUNDER REVIEWRegister version 0.1

Saltmarsh Conservation & Rehabilitation

Code MCC-M003

This code denotes a different methodology in the standard that locks it. MCC-200 v2.0 cl. 0120, locked portfolio gives M003 to Kelp Forest Cultivation and Sequestration. The methodology on this page is the one in the register and the one a verifier can actually assess, but the code alone does not identify it.

Every meaning of every code is recorded in the code register. Resolving it is before the Governing Board.

Habitat-based blue carbon credits from tropical and temperate mangrove, saltmarsh and seagrass projects, quantified using IPCC Wetland Supplement Tier 2 methods with site-specific Tier 3 calibration where the evidence base supports it.

Under review — not approved for issuance. This code was carried in the register as approved without an adopted methodology text, peer review or decision record (Standards Committee paper SC-2026-001). The Governing Board, acting as Standards Committee (a substitution proposed by MCC-700 Am1 §4.1.5, which is a stayed draft and not in force), re-labelled it UNDER REVIEW and commissioned the methodology text under MCC-200 Section 3. No project may be registered against it, and no unit issued, until a text is adopted after public consultation. Projects shown against this code are demonstrations. The family guidance below describes the family, not an approval of this code.

Methodology overview

Methodology for carbon credit generation through saltmarsh ecosystem protection and restoration, covering tidal wetland carbon dynamics and long-term sediment accumulation.

Eligibility criteria

  • ●Tropical or temperate mangrove, saltmarsh or seagrass habitat with ecological feasibility evidence (hydrology, salinity, sediment supply, donor stock).
  • ●Documented land or seabed tenure for the full crediting period, with written community consent where customary rights exist.
  • ●Historical baseline of at least 10 years of land-cover and degradation data (Sentinel-2 / Landsat back-cast).
  • ●Additionality demonstrated through barrier analysis: aquaculture pressure, encroachment, sediment starvation or active dieback.
  • ●Permanence plan implementing buffer pool drawdown (Option C) plus methodology-specific reversal monitoring.
  • ●MRV plan covering soil/sediment carbon, above- and below-ground biomass, and lateral export with site-specific defaults.
  • ●Contribution-first claims only — no neutralisation language, no fungibility with non-marine pools.

Quantification approach

Carbon pools and crediting metrics

  • ●Above-ground biomass (AGB) — allometric or LiDAR-derived
  • ●Below-ground biomass (BGB) — root-to-shoot ratios calibrated regionally
  • ●Soil / sediment organic carbon (SOC) — top 1 m unless deeper cores are justified
  • ●Dead wood and litter (de minimis; reported but not credited unless > 5% of stock)
  • ●Lateral DIC / POC export (subtracted from gross removal where measurable)

Equations (in plain language)

  • 1.Net removals = (stock change in AGB + BGB + SOC) minus (project emissions + leakage + lateral export).
  • 2.Stock change uses paired plots or chronosequence with project / control design — not single-year snapshots.
  • 3.SOC change is gain-loss where direct cores exist, or stock-difference where modelled with site-calibrated sequestration rates.
  • 4.Lateral export defaults are conservative until two consecutive verifications produce site-specific data.

Reference methodology — starting point

IPCC 2013 Wetland Supplement (Chapter 4, Coastal Wetlands) is the starting reference. Tier 2 default factors are used as a floor; Tier 3 calibration is required before any uplift above default sequestration rates can be credited.

Where MCC improves on the reference

  • ✓Mandatory ex-ante drawdown of buffer pool credits before issuance — not a paper reserve.
  • ✓AI-assisted change detection on Sentinel-2 NDVI and Sentinel-1 SAR, with anomaly review by human verifiers within 14 days.
  • ✓Lateral export accounted for explicitly rather than assumed-zero.
  • ✓Contribution-first crediting unit: removals are reported in tCO2e but never marketed as offsets.
Buffer pool
20% ref.
Reference rate for family F01. The contribution actually applied is risk-assessed per project, 10–40% (default 20%), and verified by the VVB (MCC-100 cl. 0186–0188; Buffer Pool Management Policy).
Crediting period
30 years
30-year crediting period, renewable once after a full additionality and baseline re-test. Permanence monitoring continues for 100 years after last issuance.

Monitoring requirements

Required data sources

  • ●Sentinel-2 NDVI / NDWI — quarterly, 10 m resolution
  • ●Sentinel-1 SAR backscatter — annual, for canopy and inundation under cloud
  • ●Sediment carbon density samples — LECO CN628 dry combustion every 3 years
  • ●Permanent plot AGB / BGB measurements — every 5 years, 30 plots minimum per 1,000 ha
  • ●GPS-tagged photo points — biannual, minimum 1 per 50 ha
  • ●Tide-gauge / sediment-elevation tables (SET) where elevation accretion is claimed
Frequency
Continuous remote sensing with quarterly cadence; field campaigns every 3 to 5 years depending on parameter.
Verification cadence
Independent third-party verification at year 1, year 3, then every 3 years. A reversal-trigger event forces an out-of-cycle verification within 6 months.

KPIs that must be tracked

Habitat extent change (ha)Canopy fractional cover (%)SOC density (Mg C / ha) by depthAGB / BGB stock (Mg C / ha)Reversal events count and areaBuffer pool balance (post-drawdown)

Eligible co-benefits — SDG mapping

F-family F01 contributes to the following Sustainable Development Goals. Indicators flagged as required must be reported at every verification; optional indicators may be claimed where the project chooses to report them.

GOAL 1313
RequiredSDG 13Climate Action
GOAL 1414
RequiredSDG 14Life Below Water
GOAL 1515
RequiredSDG 15Life on Land
GOAL 55
OptionalSDG 5Gender Equality
GOAL 11
OptionalSDG 1No Poverty

Public consultation and community engagement

30-day public consultation is mandatory at PDD stage. For projects that overlap customary or indigenous tenure, FPIC documentation must accompany the PDD and be re-confirmed at every verification. Local-language summaries (minimum 1,500 words) are required.

Adopted documents and version history

The binding text for this family is the adopted guidance published at /transparency/documents, together with the register entry above. Version history is carried by those documents, not by this page.

Projects using this methodology

Registry projects will appear here once registered

No registered project uses this methodology yet.