Skip to main content
Standards framework

The document set

Seven standards documents are in force (MCC-001, MCC-100, MCC-200, MCC-400, MCC-700, MCC-800, MCC-850) — design, quantification, monitoring, verification, registry operations and the use of AI; MCC-600 is not yet made, and MCC-810/MCC-820 are drafts. Methodologies are drafted under MCC-200, which requires external peer review and then a public consultation of at least 30 days before approval (cll. 0040–0042). The one adopted text, M008, went through neither: it was adopted by founder decision because the Methodology Review Committee named in MCC-001 cl. 0082 has never been constituted. Adopted texts are published with their SHA-256 on the document register; texts in consultation are on the consultations page.

01 · Programme standards
DocumentTitleScopeStatus
MCC-001Charter & ConstitutionLegal basis, mandate and organs of the programmev2.0 · Amendment 1 in consultation · Download ↓
MCC-100Programme StandardEligibility, additionality, permanence and project requirementsv2.2 · Amendment 2 in consultation · Download ↓
MCC-200Methodology FrameworkHow methodologies are drafted, consulted, approved and revisedv2.0 · Amendment 1 in consultation · Download ↓
MCC-400VVB Accreditation & PerformanceRequirements for validation and verification bodies under ISO 14065v1.1 · Download ↓
MCC-700Governance & AppealsReversal framework, buffer release, grievances and appealsv3.1 · Amendment 1 in consultation · Download ↓
MCC-800Registry OperationsSerialisation, issuance, retirement and the contribution-first claims frameworkv1.1 · Download ↓
MCC-850AI GovernanceUse of AI and remote sensing in monitoring and review; human oversightv1.2 · Download ↓
ESSEnvironmental & Social Safeguards PolicyFPIC, indigenous rights, benefit-sharing and no-harm screeningv1.0 · Download ↓
BPPBuffer Pool Management PolicyProject-specific buffer share (10–40 %), withholding and releasev1.0 · Amendment 1 in consultation · Download ↓
CA/DCCorresponding Adjustment & Double Counting PreventionRecording of host-country approval, Article 6 authorization attributes and CA evidence; double-counting prevention at the registryv1.0 · Download ↓
02 · Methodology register
CodeMethodologyVersionStatus
MCC-M001Mangrove Restoration & Conservation0.1Under review
MCC-M002Seagrass Meadow Restoration0.1Under review
MCC-M003Saltmarsh Conservation & Rehabilitation0.1Under review
MCC-M004Kelp Forest to Biochar Pathway1.0RetiredNo text of this methodology is in the programme record and no instrument records its retirement; the row is kept for the record.
MCC-M005Enhanced Coastal Weathering1.0RetiredNo text of this methodology is in the programme record and no instrument records its retirement; the row is kept for the record.
MCC-M006Marine CO2 Mineralisation0.9RetiredNo text of this methodology is in the programme record and no instrument records its retirement; the row is kept for the record.
MCC-M008Marine Gear Loss Prevention (Ghost Gear Recovery)1.1ApprovedReclassification to concept decided (FD-2026-09-03 item D6, attested 7 September 2026); the register entry is amended when affected applicants have been notified. No methodology has completed the peer review, consultation and documented approval MCC-200 cll. 0040–0047 require.

Read live from the register. No project is registered without an approved methodology (MCC-100 cl. 0008), and approval follows peer review and public consultation (MCC-200 cll. 0040–0042). The Methodology Review Committee named in MCC-001 cl. 0082 has never been constituted; MCC-001 cl. 0046 reserves methodology approval to that Committee, so on the Programme's reading (readiness register, L3.5) no methodology can presently be adopted, although MCC-200 cl. 0039 also names the Board. 5 of the 7 codes in this register (M003, M004, M005, M006, M008) denote a different methodology in MCC-200 v2.0 cl. 0120 than the one recorded here; the re-lettering that resolves it (MCC-CR-2026-002) waits on the same Committee. Retired methodologies remain listed for the record.

03 · Methodology families
Mangrove forest
F01

Blue Carbon

Mangrove, seagrass, salt marsh, tidal wetland and coastal peat. Credited as MCC-CC where an approved carbon methodology quantifies net removals, with reversal-risk controls. Methodology texts are in development; none is approved.

Open ocean surface
F02Closed to applications

Restoration — coral reef, kelp forest, oyster reef

Closed to new applications. The taxonomy in force assigns this family the instrument code MCC-HYB, which founder decision FD-2026-09-03 item D1 abolished with no successor code, so no unit could be issued against an application accepted today. No methodology exists in this family and no project has been submitted under it.

Fishing gear at sea
F03

Fisheries

Sustainable fisheries and aquaculture, and habitat protection delivered through fisheries management. The marine outcome is a conservation unit; a carbon tonne requires a separately quantified life-cycle GHG method, never gear or catch mass alone.

Marine wildlife
F04

Pollution Prevention

Plastic, ghost gear, nutrient run-off and marine debris. Credited as conservation units; no carbon claim follows from mass removed or prevented alone. This is the only family with an approved methodology.

Reef ecosystem
F05Closed to applications

MPA Management

Closed to new applications, for the reason given under F02: the taxonomy in force assigns this family the abolished MCC-HYB instrument code, and no methodology exists in it.

Families per the MCC-100 Annex — Definitions Register v1.0 §2, settled by founder decision FD-2026-08-24 item D5, which is the taxonomy in force and prevails on conflict. Founder decision FD-2026-09-03 item D2 would redraw these boundaries — coral, oyster and kelp would move to F05 and F02 would become blue-carbon avoided loss — and that decision has no published text; the boundaries are before the Governing Board. F02 and F05 are closed because the taxonomy in force assigns them an instrument code the Programme abolished, so an application accepted in either could not result in an issued unit. Draft methodology texts are open for stakeholder consultation and independent peer review before adoption; revisions follow the change-control process in MCC-200.