Two stayed rule-change consultations withdrawn; a third proposal partially withdrawn
A stay is a pause, and the notice of 3 September said the five stayed consultations would each be resumed against the successor instrument or formally withdrawn. MCC-WDR-2026-001 disposes of two of them. MCC-200 Amendment 1 and MCC-100 Amendment 2 are withdrawn — not rejected on their merits, but drafted against clauses the revised suite deletes, for instrument codes founder decision FD-2026-09-03 item D1 retires: MCC-HYB is abolished with no successor code and MCC-MCU is renamed and re-scoped as MCC-MOU. Adopting either today would write a retired code into the framework it was meant to correct. Separately, the Definitions Register Amendment 1 — never opened for consultation — is partially withdrawn: two clauses that would have registered the retired codes, and two that add nothing, come out; the rest stands and is reissued for consultation. Neither withdrawal is a decision on the merits. Every proposal text stays published, and each carries a notice saying what the proposal would have delivered and which instrument must now deliver it: the forty-year per-unit reversal-risk management period, which no instrument in the revised suite presently carries, and the alignment of MCC-200 to the canonical family taxonomy, on which the register in force and the successor draft do not agree. The determination also records that a ground the programme had published for one of these withdrawals was false, and withdraws it. Three consultations remain stayed and await their own disposal.